Technology spend is capital. Measure it like capital.

OPTIMAZE traces every dollar of AI and cloud spend to what caused it, divides it by the business activity it supports, and gives finance a figure it can defend.

OPTIMAZEQ3 FY26 · 94% attributed
Cost to serve, per customer
$11.60
▼ $2.60 since March, against a $12.00 target
Attributed spend
$2,143,880
Return on investment
3.3×
Largest product
Payments

A cost is something you minimise. Capital is something you deploy, and deployed capital is judged on what came back.

Layer 1

Data Foundation

Infrastructure
Hosting
AI
SaaS
Business context
Layer 1

Bring AI, cloud, SaaS and infrastructure costs into a single economic model. Every provider. Every environment. One complete picture.

Layer 2

Cost Attribution

Context-rich data
Customisable cost dimensions
Granular attribution
Real-time
Layer 2

Automate cost attribution to teams, products, customers, features and initiatives. Mathematical. Documented. Traceable.

Layer 3

Investment Performance

AI ROI
Cost per outcome
Revenue per product
Pricing intelligence
Portfolio performance
Unit economics
Layer 3

Understand what technology investment is producing. This is where the executive conversation happens.

THE DIFFERENCE

A cost tool can only attribute what somebody remembered to tag.

Same estate. Same 30% tag coverage. What changes is how much of it can be explained.

Annualised technology spend

$2,143,880

A cost tool. Attribution stops where the tags stop. Everything untagged falls into one bucket.

The input, identical in both

30% of resources carry a usable tag

A cost tool

OPTIMAZE

Attributed to

Amount

Share of estate

Payments

$263,106

12.3%

Checkout

$179,679

8.4%

Identity

$122,201

5.7%

Shared platform

$78,178

3.6%

Unattributed

$1,500,716

70.0%

Attribution stops where the tags stop. $1,500,716 of this estate cannot be explained.

Illustrative

Annualised technology spend

$2,143,880

A cost tool. Attribution stops where the tags stop. Everything untagged falls into one bucket.

The input, identical in both

30% of resources carry a usable tag

A cost tool

OPTIMAZE

Attributed to

Amount

Share of estate

Payments

$263,106

12.3%

Checkout

$179,679

8.4%

Identity

$122,201

5.7%

Shared platform

$78,178

3.6%

Unattributed

$1,500,716

70.0%

Attribution stops where the tags stop. $1,500,716 of this estate cannot be explained.

Illustrative

A cost is something you minimise. Capital is something you deploy, and deployed capital is judged on what came back.

FINANCIAL ATTRIBUTION

Attribution as you see it.

Attribution is computed, not configured. It is derived from how your resources, accounts, services and metadata actually relate, and maintained as rules over those relationships.

Starts on the estate you have

Untagged, partly tagged, or three conventions from three acquisitions

Attribute an untagged estate

A meaningful and accurate view exists before new tagging work begins.

Add tagging when you want it

Where you use it, it sharpens the picture rather than gating it.

Absorb inherited conventions

An estate arriving with somebody else’s tagging scheme does not need reconciling to yours first.

COVERAGE ON THE SAME ESTATE

Resources tagged

30%

Spend attributed

95%

Attribution does not depend on the tag.

Survives change

Rules over relationships, not a static chart of accounts

Absorb reorganisations

Teams and ownership can move without restating the history behind the figure.

Take on an acquisition

An inherited estate does not need retagging first.

Track workloads that scale themselves

Autoscaling and ephemeral resources stay attributed as they appear and disappear.

AFTER A REORGANISATION

Payments

$877,020

Payments_Core renamed

$877,020

Same figure, no retagging.

Finance keeps its own model

No inherited taxonomy, no waiting

Map to products, cost centres and P&L lines

The structure finance already reports on is the structure it reads here.

Stop depending on another team’s discipline

The figure does not wait on engineering hygiene work.

Keep allocation where it belongs

Shared platform services are allocated on rules finance controls.

ONE ESTATE, TWO HIERARCHIES

Engineering · payments-svc

$877k

Finance · Digital Products

$1.48M

Both reconcile to $2,143,880. Finance reads its own structure without engineering changing anything.

HOW IT WORKS

Attribute it. Measure it. Track it.

Each layer needs the one beneath it.

01

Attribution

Every dollar traced to what caused it

Derive ownership

From how resources, accounts and metadata already relate.

Absorb structural change

Reorganisations and acquisitions do not reset the figure.

Map to your financial model

Products, cost centres and P&L lines, as finance already reports them.

AcmeCorp···
$10,000,000
⌃ Collapse
···
$2,800,000
⌄ 14 more
···
$2,050,000
⌄ 14 more
···
$1,550,000
⌄ 14 more
···
$1,100,000
⌄ 14 more
···
$820,000
⌄ 14 more
···
$600,000
⌄ 14 more
···
$580,000
⌄ 14 more
···
$500,000
⌄ 14 more

01

Attribution

Every dollar traced to what caused it

Derive ownership

From how resources, accounts and metadata already relate.

Absorb structural change

Reorganisations and acquisitions do not reset the figure.

Map to your financial model

Products, cost centres and P&L lines, as finance already reports them.

AcmeCorp···
$10,000,000
⌃ Collapse
···
$2,800,000
⌄ 14 more
···
$2,050,000
⌄ 14 more
···
$1,550,000
⌄ 14 more
···
$1,100,000
⌄ 14 more
···
$820,000
⌄ 14 more
···
$600,000
⌄ 14 more
···
$580,000
⌄ 14 more
···
$500,000
⌄ 14 more

02

Unit economics

Attributed spend over business activity

Divide by what the business does

Customers served, transactions processed, features shipped.

Compare cost to serve

Across products, customer cohorts and segments.

Hold the ratio steady

While the estate underneath it keeps changing.

The division

$2,143,880
attributed spend, this quarter
184,817
customers served
$11.60
Cost to serve, per customer

02

Unit economics

Attributed spend over business activity

Divide by what the business does

Customers served, transactions processed, features shipped.

Compare cost to serve

Across products, customer cohorts and segments.

Hold the ratio steady

While the estate underneath it keeps changing.

The division

$2,143,880
attributed spend, this quarter
184,817
customers served
$11.60
Cost to serve, per customer

03

Goals, Budgets & Dashboards

Targets that move as the data moves

Set a ratio once

And track it continuously, without rebuilding it each month.

Flag drift before the month closes

Rather than explaining it afterwards.

Reconcile to the total

So the cost centre view and the estate view agree.

Monthly Spend

MTD
$2,899,100.00$2.9m
41.06%decrease vs previous period

Weekly Spend

7d
$310,460.00$310k
80.45%decrease vs last week

Yearly Spend

YTD
$36,291,990.00$36m
Trend unavailable

Net Spend by provider

12M
02m4m6mAug 2025Oct 2025Dec 2025Feb 2026Apr 2026Jun 2026Aug 2026
AnysphereAnthropicOpenAIAWSGCP

Net Spend, month on month

30d
0200k400k600k19/0725/0731/0708/0814/08
Current monthLast month

03

Goals, Budgets & Dashboards

Targets that move as the data moves

Set a ratio once

And track it continuously, without rebuilding it each month.

Flag drift before the month closes

Rather than explaining it afterwards.

Reconcile to the total

So the cost centre view and the estate view agree.

Monthly Spend

MTD
$2,899,100.00$2.9m
41.06%decrease vs previous period

Weekly Spend

7d
$310,460.00$310k
80.45%decrease vs last week

Yearly Spend

YTD
$36,291,990.00$36m
Trend unavailable

Net Spend by provider

12M
02m4m6mAug 2025Oct 2025Dec 2025Feb 2026Apr 2026Jun 2026Aug 2026
AnysphereAnthropicOpenAIAWSGCP

Net Spend, month on month

30d
0200k400k600k19/0725/0731/0708/0814/08
Current monthLast month

WHAT IT TAKES TO GET THERE

Days, not a journey.

1 day

To an attributed view of the estate

Across different technologies

Half a day

To reconcile, down from weeks

Previously a multi-week manual exercise.

90%

Attributed estate in day 1

Normalised figure across multiple customers

8

Cloud and AI providers connected

AWS, GCP, Azure, OpenAI, Anthropic, Cursor etc

No tagging standard. No data hygiene program. No clean estate required first.

IN THE PLATFORM

Everything, grouped by the layer it serves.

FOUNDATION

Integrations

Cost data enrichment

Amortised cost

Business metrics

Metric presets

ATTRIBUTION

Attribution graph

Allocation rules

Atlas conversational setup

Real-time tagging, on request

Filters and dimensions

PERFORMANCE

Unit economics

Goals

Budgets

Dashboards

Analytics

Anomaly detection

GOVERNANCE

Audit log

Users and access

ISO 27001 certified

Trust Center

FOUNDATION

Integrations

Cost data enrichment

Amortised cost

Business metrics

Metric presets

PERFORMANCE

Unit economics

Goals

Budgets

Dashboards

Analytics

Anomaly detection

ATTRIBUTION

Attribution graph

Allocation rules

Atlas conversational setup

Real-time tagging, on request

Filters and dimensions

GOVERNANCE

Audit log

Users and access

ISO 27001 certified

Trust Center

SOLUTIONS

Start with the spend you already own.

AI Economics

What is AI spend producing? Token-level attribution tied to the features and teams driving it.

Cloud Economics

What is cloud spend producing? Attribution across accounts and services, without a tagging programme first.

SaaS Economics

Which licences are earning their place? Software spend measured against the business activity it supports.

Coming soon

Connects to

AWS

Google Cloud

Azure

OpenAI

Anthropic

Cursor

Zapier

WHAT IT ANSWERS

The questions a CFO actually asks.

Built around what finance is accountable for, not what infrastructure teams optimise.

What does this AI feature cost to run, and what does it earn?

Token-level attribution tied to the feature and the revenue it supports.

What revenue is this investment generating?

Infrastructure and AI spend connected to the business activity it produced.

Which initiatives are earning their place?

A portfolio view of return, rather than a list of costs by account.

Where should capital be reallocated?

A continuous signal on where the return is strongest and where it is not.

What does this AI feature cost to run, and what does it earn?

Token-level attribution tied to the feature and the revenue it supports.

What revenue is this investment generating?

Infrastructure and AI spend connected to the business activity it produced.

Which initiatives are earning their place?

A portfolio view of return, rather than a list of costs by account.

Where should capital be reallocated?

A continuous signal on where the return is strongest and where it is not.

QUESTIONS

The things people ask first.

What is Technology Capital Performance?

Technology Capital Performance is the measurement of whether technology spend is producing a proportionate, attributable return. OPTIMAZE attributes cloud and AI spend to what caused it, divides it by the business activity it supports, and tracks that ratio against a target.

Does OPTIMAZE require us to tag our cloud resources?

No. Attribution is derived from how resources, accounts, services and metadata actually relate to one another, so a defensible and accurate view exists on an entirely untagged environment. Where you ask for it, OPTIMAZE also tags resources as they are created and backfills the history behind them. Tagging is an input, never a precondition.

How is this different from a cloud cost management tool?

A cost management tool is built to reduce spend. OPTIMAZE is built to measure what spend produced. A cost is something you minimise; capital is something you deploy, and deployed capital is judged on the return it produced. The two ask different questions of the same dollar.

What does OPTIMAZE connect to?

AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, OpenAI, Anthropic, Cursor, Zapier and Slack. Read-only access, with nothing to install in your estate.

How long before we have a number?

With the right setup, an attributed view of the estate is live in a day, and unit economics follow in days rather than months. Reconciliation that previously took weeks takes about half a day.

Does Optimaze hold any security certifications, such as SOC 1, SOC 2, or ISO 27001?

Yes. Optimaze is ISO27001 certified and inprocess with SOC 2 Type 2 certification

GET STARTED

See what your technology spend produced.

Not what it cost. Not what you saved. What came back.

That measurement is Technology Capital Performance.

Technology Capital Performance is the measurement of whether technology spend is producing a proportionate, attributable return.

© 2026 Optimaze Services Pty Ltd

Technology Capital Performance is the measurement of whether technology spend is producing a proportionate, attributable return.

Technology Capital Performance is the measurement of whether technology spend is producing a proportionate, attributable return.